Connect with us

News

[JUSTIN] Terroism Charges: Court Discharges, Acquits Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

[JUSTIN] Terroism Charges: Court Discharges, Acquits Nnamdi Kanu

By Oladosu Oluwagbenga 

On Thursday, the Court of Appeal in Abuja dismissed the terrorism allegation that the Federal Government had brought against Nnamdi Kanu, the arrested leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB.

It cleared him of the seven-count indictment against him that was pending before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Advertisement

In a ruling by a three-person panel chaired by Justice Jummai Hanatu, the appellate court said that it was satisfied that the FG had flagrantly broken the law when it extradited Nnamdi Kanu from Kenya to the country to continue his prosecution.

READ ALSO: Olufemi Ajadi & 2023: Increasing Popularity & Acceptance Anywhere He Goes

The Grievous Sins Nigerians Are Holding Against APC

Advertisement

Video: moment BBNaija Rico was battling for his life surfaces

It determined that the Appellant’s fundamental human rights had been violated and that such an extraordinary rendition, carried out without following due legal procedure, was a flagrant violation of all international treaties, protocols, and guidelines to which Nigeria is a signatory.

The appellate court noted that FG has not answered the claim that the IPOB leader was in Kenya when he was kidnapped and returned to Nigeria without going through the extradition process.

Advertisement

It held that FG was “ominously silent on the issue” which it described as very pivotal in determining whether the trial court would still have the jurisdiction to continue with the criminal proceeding before it.

“In law, that is a costly failure and such failure is an admittance by the Respondent.

“Where a party fails to controvert a deposition by an opponent, the issue not contested is deemed conceded”, the court held, adding that the onus was on FG to prove the legality of the Appellant’s arrest and return from Kenya.

Advertisement